🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.