🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". A law may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," said a leading MEP driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is mostly happening at the local level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some figures to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Beyond these regions, additional nations are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies adopt a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The body points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this global discussion evolves, the steps of this nation and its followers show that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.